Wyoming grizzly bear sightings mark end of hibernation

JACKSON, Wyoming (AP) — Officials say grizzly bears are starting to emerge from hibernation in northwest Wyoming.

The Jackson Hole News and Guide reports a state Game and Fish Department warden spotted a bear last Friday near the base of Steamboat Mountain — a week after bears were sighted outside their dens in nearby Yellowstone National Park.

Officials say people can now expect to see grizzly and black bears in the area through the beginning of next winter.

Officials recommend for those spending time in grizzly habitat to carry bear spray, travel in groups and stay at least 100 yards away from bears.

Yellowstone officials recorded the first grizzly sighting this year on March 8 south of Canyon Village.

Study: Car vs. moose collisions more likely to be fatal than other wildlife crashes

Drivers in the Intermountain West’s highways always have to be on the lookout for wildlife, but a new study shows they should be especially wary of encountering moose on the road.

A study by the Journal of the American College of Surgeons recently analyzed 500 crashes in Northern New England and found that vehicle crashes involving moose are 13 times more likely to result in death than an accident with a deer.

Researchers for the study analyzed motor vehicle crash data from state fish and wildlife agencies in Vermont, New Hampshire, Maine, the Maine Department of Transportation and three trauma centers in Maine and New Hampshire.

Most of the crashes occurred in Maine, according to the study, with researchers analyzing 50,281 collisions with deer and 7,062 with moose from 2003 to 2017.

“Obviously, this issue is localized to the northern areas of the United States, but it is also a significant issue in Canada and Scandinavia,” lead author David E. Clark of the Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation at Maine Medical Center said in a news release. “Medical professionals in these geographic regions should be aware of the typical injury pattern and should support preventive efforts.”

The report describes moose as “massive animals, weighing from 800 to 1,300 pounds and standing as tall as 6 feet, 6 inches at the shoulder.”

It said, “(when the front of a vehicle strikes a moose, it tends to impact its long legs, sending the bulk of the animal to collide into the windshield and roof.”

The researchers found that motor vehicle collisions involving moose are most frequent after sunset and, to a lesser extent, near sunrise, the report said.

“However, the risk of fatal collision is almost three times greater at midday than at other times during the day, perhaps because of speed and driver factors,” it said.

Seasonally, collisions are more frequent in the late spring and summer, it said.

Eastern Idaho is not immune to accidents involving moose.

From 2010 to 2014 , there were 94 reported crashes with wildlife on U.S. Highway 20, which were 16 percent of the total 572 reported crashes. Seventeen of those involved moose, according to a 2016 Idaho Transportation Department report looking at U.S. 20 and wildlife.

Moose are a high concern in the Falls River-Chester segment of U.S. 20, according to the report, as well as U.S. 87 toward Henry’s Lake and Yellowstone National Park.

Other areas common for moose include Big Bend Ridge, Osborne Bridge to Macks Inn and almost the entire Caribou-Targhee National Forest Region, according to the report.

Fremont County Sheriff Len Humphries said collisions with moose aren’t common, but drivers should be cautious due to the high amount of moose in the region.

He said most car collisions with moose that he knows of have happened on U.S. 20. On Friday, he recalled two incidents: a family that hit a moose near Island Park and when a motorcyclist died after his motorcycle ran into a moose about 20 years ago.

“The car takes the legs out of the moose and then it comes through the windshield,” Humphries said. “It was a family from India and when the EMTs got there, there was blood and gore everywhere. Miraculously, no one from the family was seriously injured, as all the blood was from the moose.”

Living in Egin, a community right outside Fremont County, Humphries says he and his wife have had moose come into their yard, though he hasn’t come across one while driving recently.

He says to be safe, drivers should try and watch for signs of animals on the side of the road. Do not swerve or try to evade animals while driving, he said.

US moves to lift remaining gray wolf protections

Gray wolves in the U.S. would be stripped of federal protection and subject to hunting and trapping in more states under a proposal released Thursday that declares the predators recovered following a decades-long restoration effort.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service wants to revoke the wolves’ endangered and threatened species status and put them under authority of state wildlife agencies across the Lower 48 states. The Associated Press reported last week that the proposal was in the works.

Wildlife advocates and some members of Congress said the move is premature because wolves occupy only a fraction of a historical range that once stretched across most of North America.

But Acting Interior Secretary David Bernhardt said it was “indisputable” that wolves had recovered enough to meet recovery goals. He said the agency could now devote more work to species in greater need.

Livestock interests, hunters and officials in some states have wanted the government to make it easier to kill wolves. The predators periodically prey on livestock such as cows and sheep and have been blamed for declining numbers of elk, moose and other big game in some areas.

“We need to take control of these wolves,” said Tony Demboski with the Upper Peninsula Sportsmen’s Alliance in Michigan, where there are an estimated 660 of the animals. “They’re cleaning up our deer herd, we’ve got people scared to go for a walk in the evenings. We’ve just got too many wolves.”

Those who want more wolves in more places say such fears are overblown. Wolves very rarely attack people, and far more livestock are killed by other causes, including coyotes and disease.

“It doesn’t have to be either or — we have livestock or we have wolves,” said Kate Dylewsky with the Animal Welfare Institute. “Co-existence with wolves is very possible.”

Trapping, poisoning and hunting campaigns early last century exterminated wolves across most of the Lower 48 states by the 1930s. More than 6,000 of the animals now live in portions of nine states, officials say.

A final decision on lifting protections will follow a public comment period that begins Friday and runs through May 14.

Government officials said their goal was to protect wolves from extinction, not return them to everywhere they were once found.

The Endangered Species Act is not “a means to keep species from being hunted in perpetuity once they’ve met the threshold of recovery,” said Gavin Shire, spokesman for the Fish and Wildlife Service.

Environmentalists and animal advocacy groups have pledged to challenge in court any action to ease or eliminate protections.

Putting gray wolves under state control would allow Minnesota, Michigan and Wisconsin to resume hunting and trapping blocked by a 2014 court ruling that returned them to the endangered list.

In other areas, such as the Pacific Northwest, wildlife officials say they have no immediate plans for hunting but could consider it in the future.

Aside from Alaska only three states — Montana, Idaho and Wyoming — currently allow the public to hunt wolves.

More than 600 were killed in the Northern Rockies states during the most recent hunting and trapping seasons.

Court rulings delayed hunting in the Northern Rockies for years after wolves reached the government’s benchmark for recovery in the early 2000s. Members of the region’s Congressional delegation ultimately inserted a provision into a budget bill that forced the animals off the endangered list.

Protections will be retained under Thursday’s proposal for two small populations of related species — the Mexican gray wolf in New Mexico and Arizona and the red wolf in North Carolina.

Recoil: How much is too much?

Most African professional hunters will tell you that if an American hunter shows up on safari with a rifle caliber over a .375 Holland and Holland Magnum, he will be a lousy shooter because Americans generally are afraid of the recoil that comes from shooting the traditional big-bore charge stoppers like the .416 Rigby, .378 Weatherby Magnum, .470 Nitro express, .458 Winchester Magnum and .460 Weatherby Magnum. In reality, there are a lot of American hunters that shoot the large-bore charge stoppers very well, but those African guides also have a point in thinking that Americans would shoot better with a .375 Holland and Holland Magnum as their dangerous-game rifle caliber because it recoils with less than 40 foot pounds of energy.

The first two differences in American and European big game hunters that should be taken into consideration are that Americans tend to want light-weight rifles even in their big-bore Magnum calibers, whereas the European sport hunters have always preferred heavy, at least 12 pounds, in their dangerous-game rifles. The second difference is that European dangerous-game hunters tend to quickly bring the rifle to their shoulders put the front sight on the target and fire, or what Americans would call a snap shot if they didn’t, and they usually don’t, understand the mechanics behind the way the professionals in Africa and most Europeans shoot at dangerous game. Americans on the other hand, if not trained otherwise, tend to bring the rifle to their shoulder, look down the sight radius and hold their front sight on the target like they were waiting for the maple sap to run in February before deciding the sight picture is good and firing. It is enough to drive the calmest and steadiest African and American professional hunters to drink heavily.

The light-weight rifles that Americans prefers are not usually over 8 pounds before installing a telescopic sight. When shooting the .30-caliber, and 40-caliber Magnums out of such light rifles what you get in the chops and shoulder is eye-crossing recoil and three-day headaches.

The European and African hunters with much heavier rifles don’t experience the same kind of jarring recoil, but describe the recoil of their heavy rifles as a push as opposed to a punch. I’m sure that is true of the double rifles that are used in African hunting, but even the bolt-action rifles of dangerous-game hunters in Africa weigh 10 pounds or more.

During the time I have been hunting, I have learned that recoil over 20 foot-pounds, which a .30-06 generates, is where most American shooters become uncomfortable and tend to anticipate the shot, close both eyes and flinch as they shoot. It is true that there are many American shooters and hunters that own and shoot .30-caliber Magnums and more, but they had to get used to the recoil, which can be double the recoil of a .30-06 or more, before they could shoot those Magnums well. I have even seen a couple of those owners at the range who were still flinching in anticipation of the shot and recoil.

An 8-pound .30-06 as mentioned before, recoils at 20.3 foot-pounds of energy, coming back at the shooter at 12.8 feet per second, using a 180 grain bullet. This is about the most recoil that many can tolerate and can get used to when shooting. An 8.5-pound .300 Winchester Magnum, with a 180-grain bullet should recoil with 26 foot-pounds of energy, coming back at the shooter at 14 feet per second. My 8-pound .300 Weatherby Magnum, shooting a 180-grain bullet recoils with about 35 foot-pounds, coming back at the shooter at 16 feet per second.

The .300 Weatherby Magnum is the point where in a addition to holding the butt of the rifle stock tight into my shoulder, I also use a sling to reduce the upward rise of the barrel after the shot.

I have two grandsons that love the .300 Weatherby and shoot it very well without flinching. Another grandson who is older, won’t go near the .300 Weatherby or anything else that recoils more than a .30-06.

The .338 Winchester Magnum and .375 Holland and Holland Magnum have larger bores than the .30-caliber Magnums and use heavier bullets with about the same recoil numbers as the .300 Weatherby. The .340 Weatherby Magnum is a 338 caliber and is about the largest case and most powder that can efficiently be used to drive a .338-caliber bullet out of the barrel. Using a 9-pound rifle and a 250-grain bullet, the .340 Weatherby Magnum generates 43.4 foot-pounds of recoil, coming back at the shooter at 17.6 feet per second. It definitely gets your attention and is the hardest hitting caliber I would think anyone in North America would feel they needed for the largest ungulates and bears.

The foot-pounds of energy at which a given caliber recoils depends on the weight of the rifle as well as the amount of powder used to drive the bullet. Perceived recoil is a product of the foot-pounds of energy plus the speed at which the rifle recoils. Perceived recoil is somewhat subjective among shooters. It is perceived recoil that we all use to determine how much recoil is too much recoil.

Smokey Merkley was raised in Idaho and has been hunting since he was 10 years old. He can be contacted at mokeydo41245@hotmail.com.

The world’s best bike movies come to Idaho Falls

Filmed by Bike, Portland, Oregon’s famed bicycle-themed film festival is making a stop at the Waterfront at Snake River Landing on Thursday. The traveling festival features more than 15 films from all over the world. The Idaho Falls showing will be divided into two parts: “Bike Love” and “Adventure Shorts.”

Presented by Idaho Falls Community Pathways and the Idaho Walk Bike Alliance, the festival raises funds for walk and bike advocacy across the state and to promote and advocate for local pathway construction and other walking/cycling improvements including Safe Routes to School projects and programs. The title sponsor for Filmed by Bike in Idaho Falls is Bill’s Bike and Run at 930 Pier View Drive in Idaho Falls.

Tickets are available online at idahowalkbike.brownpapertickets.com for $15 or for $17 at the door. This is an all-ages show. Beer, wine and food will be available, and there will be a raffle. Doors open at 6 p.m., and the films start at 7 p.m.

Project WILD workshop coming to Pocatello

How would you like to be a “WILD teacher”? A “WILD teacher” is one who has participated in a Project WILD workshop presented by the Idaho Department of Fish and Game. Participants learn about wildlife and discover fun and exciting ways to teach wildlife conservation and ecological concepts in the classroom. Plus, it is a great way to earn a credit through an Idaho university.

Fish and Game’s next workshop, WILD About Early Learners, is geared for educators who work with youth, pre-kindergarten through second grade. This workshop will run April 5 from 4 p.m. to 9 p.m. and continue April 6 from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. The workshop will be held at the Fish and Game office in Pocatello, 1345 Barton Road.

The fee for WILD About Early Learners is $40. Optional university credit is available for $60 to $75 through most Idaho universities. An outside assignment is required for those who are taking the workshop for credit.

To register online, visit idfg.idaho.gov/education/project-wild/introductory. You can also register by contacting Lori Adams, Project WILD coordinator, at 208-863-3236 or via email at lori.adams@idfg.idaho.gov.

Workshop participants will receive three activity guides with over 150 wildlife-related activities, all of which are correlated to Idaho State Education standards. Participants will be exposed to modified Project WILD activities to fit the needs of a younger audience — incorporating science, art, math, vocabulary, music and movement, home connections, and much more!

Project WILD workshops are ideal for all types of educators — schoolteachers, 4-H leaders, scout leaders, docents, interpreters for zoos, homeschool educators — anyone who is involved in sharing conservation education with others. And Project WILD isn’t just for the science educators. Even if you teach math, art, PE, or run the library at your school, there is something for you in Project WILD!

First grizzly bear sighting of 2019 reported in Yellowstone

Grizzly bears are waking up in Yellowstone National Park. 

Visitors spotted a large grizzly last Friday between Canyon Village and Fishing Bridge, Yellowstone officials announced in a news release. Tracks were also seen between Mammoth Hot Springs and Norris Junction. 

It’s that time of year, as male grizzlies usually come out of hibernation in mid-to-late March. Females with cubs leave the dens in April and early May. 

Bears leaving hibernation look for food and often feed on elk and bison that died over the winter, the release said. The release added that bears sometimes react aggressively while consuming a carcass.

Yellowstone’s release said all of the park is bear country, and that visitors should take precautions like hiking or skiing in groups, making noise and carrying bear spray. Restrictions began in some bear management areas on Sunday, including the Firehole area, Mary Mountain Trail, Richard’s Pond and Gneiss Creek, among others.

Watershed Guardians BeaverCount volunteer training set for Saturday; BeaverCount set for Feb. 2

POCATELLO — Watershed Guardians’ eighth annual BeaverCount training will begin at 10 a.m. Saturday at the Mink Creek Nordic Center off the Scout Mountain Road. The BeaverCount will be held Feb. 2, meeting at the same location.

BeaverCount is a free, snowshoeing and cross-country skiing event where participants trek into our watershed to assess the current state of the beaver populations.

On Jan. 26, volunteers will meet at the Mink Creek Nordic Center and learn about wilderness first response, physical assessment and warm-ups, navigation and beaver habitat. From the Nordic Center, you will snowshoe on approximately one mile of easy-to-moderate trail and see the benefits of having beaver in our watersheds. Some useful snowshoe techniques you’ll learn include side-hilling, toe kick and water crossing. When you return, you can share your stories with us and enjoy hot soup and snacks to warm up and select their zones for the upcoming count. You’ll need sturdy boots, warm-layered clothing, day pack, water bottles, gloves, sunglasses and a hat. Teams are encouraged to register.

Then, the following weekend, those trained to spot beaver activity, winter preparedness, wildlife conservation and any number of other skills related to snowshoeing, will hike or ski into streams that are part of our watershed. This year’s locations will include Mink and Toponce basins.

Opportunities exists for those of all ages. If you were trained previously but have not trained in the last five years, you’re encouraged to re-attend the training.

Watershed Guardians is a nonprofit organization whose mission is, “To maintain, restore and protect the Portneuf Watershed, one beaver at a time.”

To register, visit www.watershedguardians.org/beavercount-viii or www.facebook.com/watershed guardians or call Mike at 208-232-0825.

The best big game rifle for Idahoans

Discussing the best big game rifle could cause a civil war. This is a topic more serious than politics. There’s be a better chance of seeing Hillary Clinton and President Donald Trump holding hands walking down Main Street drinking a latte than for an ardent 30-06 lover to set down and have a civil talk with a .270 fanatic.

Why is this such a touchy subject, the non-hunter may ask? I’ll tell you why: Not only are there arguments as to which is the best rifle manufacturer, but also as to what type of actions. Bolt-actions, lever-actions, pumps or semi-automatics. And for sure the most vehement arguments will be about the best caliber.

A lot of your choices will be strictly sentimental. Your dad or uncle used this rifle and you bought a rifle just like theirs and killed your first deer with it. It would almost be sacrilegious to change your beliefs.

So everyone will have their own rationale as to the best caliber. It may be for sentimental reasons as stated above. It may be because you saw John Wayne use such and such rifle or you may scientifically decide that this rifle has the fastest feet per second, knock-down power or whatever. And even among the scientific thinkers, they can err. Do you really think it matters if a bullet is zipping along at 2,800 feet per second as compared with brand X that only flies along at 2,700 feet per second?

And then a lot of it can be because of marketing. Here’s what I mean by that. How come the rifle that last year was advertised as the absolute best rifle ever designed is suddenly outdated? In one year! Because they have to advertise and breed contempt or you’ll buy one rifle and keep it for the rest of your life, pass it on to your kids and then it will be passed along to your grandkids. That’s not good for business.

I had to ditch my old Remington 742 I bought when I was 12 years old with my paper route earnings. Everyone knows bolt-actions are more accurate, so I bought a new Remington 700 .338 Win Mag — and missed the first bull I saw. Hold on — wait a minute. I thought they were the ultimate. I’d shot turkeys in the head at 60 yards with my old 742 and made dozens of head shots on deer with it. I’d been hoodwinked.

I say all of the above to show that people make up their minds as to which rifle/caliber is the best based on a lot of sub-standard reasoning and emotions. Or it may just be preferences. It’s like saying what is the best wife? Black haired? Blonde? Red haired? Pink, blue or orange haired? It’s a preference, not a right or wrong.

So with all of the above said, if you’re new to Idaho and trying to decide which rifle to buy, I’ll try to help you out. Forever, I used my old Remington 742 semi-automatic 30-06. It worked fine. For close shots, it was plenty accurate, but most people would agree that a bolt-action rifle is the most accurate and dependable. So I’d tell you to get a bolt-action rifle.

Years ago, to get a 1- to 1 ½-inch group, you had to get a custom rifle and reload. Now, there are a few factory rifles that are capable of getting 1 ½-inch groups with factory ammo. I’ve tested a couple of Mossbergs and been able to do this with them. So you don’t have to buy a super expensive custom-made rifle anymore to get good groups. (To tighten down your groups, you probably will need a trigger job.)

Now what about calibers? If you can only afford one rifle, I’d say get a 30-06. You can kill anything in America with it, but the .300 Winchester Magnum is better. They’ll be a little bit of an over kill on antelope and small deer, but still you’ll have a rifle that you can hunt everything in North America with. Then you have all of the other popular rounds, .308s, .270s, .243s, etc. Too many to list. Then, of course, right now everyone is in love with the 6.5 Creedmoor. But if you’re new to Idaho, I’d say get a 30-06 or more likely a .300 Winchester Magnum. I have a .338 Win. Mag. but wish I had of gotten a .300.

Almost as big of a factor as which caliber you choose is which ammo you use. I test a lot of ammo and am constantly amazed at how accuracy varies from ammo to ammo in my rifle. Just as important is how it performs when it hits an animal.

For years, I used the old Remington Core-Lokt ammo. As a kid, it only cost $10/box, so I couldn’t see paying $40 to $50 per box for the higher priced stuff. But it’d perform great on 10 to 15 deer in a row and then suddenly it wouldn’t. I remember one year I had to shoot a deer three times to drop it and an antelope twice all in the same year. That got me checking out better performing ammo.

Well, we are way out of room and have barely gotten started. Hopefully this short article will get you started. Or you maybe want to play it safe and just buy one of every caliber!

Tom Claycomb lives in Idaho and has outdoors columns in newspapers in Alaska, Idaho, Utah, Nevada, Colorado and Louisiana. He also writes for various outdoors magazines and teaches outdoors seminars at stores like Cabela’s, Sportsman’s Warehouse and Bass Pro Shop.